Dear American Men Part 2

Dear American Men (Part 2) (and the women who love their men):

The Feminist War on Men and Boys has reached a new and desperate level of brutality and despicability. Men—and the Women who love and value the humanity of their fathers, brothers, husbands, and sons—must stand up to the disgraceful “useful idiots” and Feminist bullies championing this war.

To sum up the legal situation of the Feminist ideation of “sexual assault,” which—unlike rape—can mean anything to any woman at any time, I would assert that every woman who makes a criminal charge is either:

A victim of a serious violent crime against her person (think Ted Bundy).

-or-

A Perpetrator of a serious crime against a person (think Duke false "rape" case).

Though I tend to see the world in a thousand shades of grey there just isn’t much wiggle room here. If the woman is a victim of violence, the perpetrator must be brought to justice and punished accordingly. If the woman is a perpetrator and has attempted to murder, kidnap, and impoverish another human being using the criminal justice system as her weapon of choice, she must be brought to justice and punished accordingly. This is finally starting to happen but without much enthusiasm. We need to do something about that. But this is where due process comes in and what makes us a civilized society.

Of course, this is all very reasonable—but Feminists are not reasonable. We have solid data from the “college campus sexual assault insurance industry” that the vast majority of payouts do not go to women who were assaulted. NO! The majority of payouts (in $) (over 70%) go to men who were falsely accused by female perpetrators and who survived the onslaught of the Title IX empowered college administrators, the criminal justice system, and not a small amount of hero status seeking by Left-leaning low testosterone virtue-signaling males. This is not an attempt to provide cover for men who commit crimes against women. They must be dealt with harshly—but they must receive due process.

“The higher education insurance group United Educators did a study of the 262 insurance claims it paid to students between 2006 and 2010 because of campus sexual assault, at a cost to the group of $36 million,” she wrote. “The vast majority of the payouts, 72 percent, went to the accused — young men who protested their treatment by universities.”

This data is empirical, it is unassailable, and it is accurate—and it won’t change a single Feminist mind. It won’t change a thing because of the immutable personality traits that afflict the majority (of the minority) of women self-defining as “Feminists.”

I am a writer. I observe the human condition. I generalize what I observe. And then I write about my observations, generalizations, and conclusions. I am also a voracious reader and world traveler and I have lived a long life. I read everything that interests me—and these subjects interest me—and I do it on my own volition—not because I seek approval in the form of a credential from the college cartel or to cooperate with the occupational licensing industrial complex. I am free to arrive at my conclusions unconcerned with the politics or optics of it all, and I am not trying to bill your insurance carrier or convince someone who is not accessible to reason. Consider that for a moment. I have a great deal of faith in people. When we see a broad consensus on social observations, you know we are getting close to the Truth—or at least an accurate description of the issue.

My observations inform me that female political “Feminists” are primarily (not exclusively!) comprised of two ill-fitted subsets of women (I will get to the pathetic and primarily childless men who support Feminism shortly):

1: Women suffering from what I have termed “heterosexual dysphoria” (“HD”). This includes confirmed “Lesbians” but is not limited to confirmed “Lesbians.” (Anyone reading this who is old enough to remember the term “frigid” to describe the sexual sensibilities of some women might understand immediately.) In short, the demographic spectrum of women who—existentially—do not value men, especially socially or sexually (men are okay for commercial fishing, logging, car repair, et al). And in no way, shape, or form am I suggesting that such women should not be free to decide who they will (or will not) socialize or have sex with. (If I may digress: My observations and research tell me that women from certain regions of the world—Europe, Asia, Africa—experience different rates of heterosexual dysphoria. If you doubt this, search for a dyke bar in Tokyo. If you find one, go inside and count the number of women there. Then fly to New York City or London and conduct the same research. Let’s compare notes when you have completed the task.)

2: Women suffering from Cluster B personality disorders. Of course, there is no “cluster” of personality disorders—Borderline, Histrionic, High-Conflict, Narcistic, et al. The false gods of the mental health profession have sought to have their name immortalized with a separate diagnosis. I assert it would be better to scrap them all and simply call this suite of elusive and difficult to define conditions what it is: Female Variant Anti-Social Personality Disorder (my sense of it all informs me that there are fewer Male Variant Sociopaths ("MVS") walking around but they (obviously) commit far more serious violent crime).

Female Variant Sociopaths (“FVS”) suffer a terrible and ongoing internal emotional storm, and that storm manifests itself in many ways, but the raging emotional swings these women externalize between the idealization and devaluation of the people in their lives —especially the man they are sexually involved with—could move rivers and mountains. I emphasize that this emotional storm, or struggle, is internal—but the sufferer invariably seeks external factors to blame for what they are feeling. The FVS' expression of this emotional storm is external—they act out in mind-bending ways. One afternoon, the FVS is the most loving, caring, sexually compatible lover a man could imagine, and the next morning she is quite capable of accusing her lover of rape. 

FVS usually do not use guns or knives or vehicles the way MVS do. No, they use manipulation, character assignation, and social bullying via the criminal justice system, family and divorce courts, and social media/gossip. My primary assertion here is that this is the source of these false accusations—and one of the consequences has been the over 70% insurance payouts by university insurance companies to the men who were falsely accused of sexual assault by the FVS women defined in category 2 above, with the assistance and encouragement of the HD women defined in category 1 to support their political agenda.

For many years, I did not fully understand the mechanism, or perhaps the commonality, that bound these groups together—until I started to read the available literature on the human emotional expression of “empathy.” Or, perhaps I already understood it but used different jargon. I have concluded that women suffering from FVS and HD have much lower—and in some cases nonexistent—ability to feel empathy—especially towards men and the product of men: CHILDREN—when compared to heterosexual and non-sociopathic women. This seems to manifest itself primarily in the abortion issue. Women suffering from FVS and HD do not feel empathy towards children—unborn or born—or men but seem to be empathetic to women who support abortion and not empathetic to women who oppose abortion.  

Censorship—another expression of low empathy—is at the very heart of Feminism. Feminism cannot continue to exist in a world where people can speak freely and openly while engaging in a rational co-examination of a set of facts. Feminists will happily censor photos of what happens to (the millions) human beings during an abortion while waving around the (hundreds of) photos of women they claim died from “unsafe” illegal abortions. There seems to be a high correlation between low empathy and the inability to grasp scale.

In my book, “Seven Years of Famine,” there is a passage where I lay waste to Feminism in general and the Feminist argument supporting the ethics of abortion in particular. Several Pro-Life organizations have used my writings and ideas before... but after reading "Famine," one of the national organizations said it was the most profound argument on the subject ever—but they felt it was too hot to handle. 

But abortion can never be extinguished using government force and violence. The ideas of Life and our humanity must be won one heart at a time. And some people just don’t have a heart—or the ability to feel empathy. And while I am not denying their humanity, I do not feel that it is inconsistent to say that such people are pathological, anti-social, and somewhat less than human. Such people are more than capable, nay willing, to convict and imprison a man on the mere word of a woman—despite all of the available evidence that false accusations appear to be, at least on college campuses, the case in most circumstances—in the morning and then head off to an abortion clinic and dismember a human being in the afternoon. But while there is Life there is hope. We can only try to reason with our fellow man. We must not allow such people to come to power and we must strip them of power where they are now entrenched.

People, you and me, cannot “know” anything beyond our immediate experiences—and even then we get much of it wrong. We take in information—and in the current construct, that information comes primarily from purveyors of propaganda—and then reach conclusions that support the biases we already have. Some people are accessible to reason and can take in new information and change their minds; reach different conclusions. People who are not accessible to reason simply cannot do this. They are stuck in the intellectual cement of the propagandists.

We are living through one of the worst mass-hysteria in history. Let's hope it doesn't top the worst. But there is a good reason for hope. The vast majority of people—men and women—are not sociopaths. The vast majority of women do not hate their fathers, brothers, husbands, and sons. Good, rational, and reasonable people must protect ourselves, each other, and especially our sons from these pathological belief systems and these hateful, disturbed people who, through no fault of their own, were stripped of the ability to feel the kind of love that parents have for their children. I feel empathy for them—a human emotion it seems they will never know.

Please get out an vote this November. The future of our sons is at stake.



("Dear American Men" (Part 1) can be found by clicking here.)

#Feminism, #Blasey-Ford, #sexual-assault, #war-on-men, #Kavanaugh